These changes will not, by themselves, guarantee a different U.S.
rethink the sanctions policy toward Russia and use them with restraint. be clear with Ukraine and Georgia that they should not base their foreign policies on the assumption that they will join NATO, but sustain robust programs of security cooperation with them and. halt NATO’s eastward expansion and refocus on the alliance’s core mission of collective defense. leave Russia’s internal affairs for Russians to untangle. interests vis-à-vis Russia and focus on the essentials-the nuclear relationship and strategic stability To break out of this impasse, the United States will have to-for its part-make several key adjustments to its Russia policy, including: In today’s poisoned climate, where Russia is seen as the cause of many problems in the world, changing that consensus will be an uphill struggle. The post–Cold War consensus in the United States-its primacy in a unipolar world, insistence on no spheres of influence, and commitment to democracy promotion-is baked into its foreign policy DNA. intrusions and they rely on anti-Americanism to legitimize their unpopular policies with domestic audiences. They do not accept American primacy and want to accelerate the transition from a unipolar to a multipolar world they reject democracy promotion as a cover for U.S.-sponsored regime change they believe they are entitled to a sphere of influence and will resist perceived U.S. Russian leaders see their country as a great power in charge of its own destiny. Yet the difficulty of managing the relationship is compounded by the fact that both countries are set in their respective approaches to each other and will find it hard to change course. Russia is vitally important to the United States, however, and managing this relationship responsibly-even if not necessarily making it better or solving problems-is a task that U.S. political climate, and as a result there will be few opportunities for cooperation even where Washington and Moscow have common interests. 
Russia’s image is toxic in the current U.S. approach to dealing with Russia and the states of the former Soviet Union could have resulted in a more productive U.S.-Russian relationship.Ĭhanging the trajectory of U.S.-Russian relations will be difficult.
#Cold war phenomena definition how to
When Moscow pushed back, Washington reasserted its right and responsibility to teach Russia and its neighbors how to manage their affairs rather than take account of Russian objections. It is hard to escape the conclusion that a more restrained U.S. They have defined American interests in the most expansive terms, failing to distinguish between core and peripheral concerns or to prioritize them. policymakers have repeatedly exaggerated America’s ability to affect developments in Russia and their influence over the Kremlin. Russia policy, reflected in commitments to ambitious goals without the means to accomplish them. Overreach has been a persistent feature of U.S. policy toward Russia account for the failures over the past three decades.
insistence that NATO is the only legitimate security organization for Europe and Eurasia and the extension of the Euro-Atlantic security architecture to the Eurasian space surrounding Russia, which in Moscow’s eyes represented a threat to Russian security. 
a refusal to accept Russia for what it is, as evidenced by repeated initiatives to reform and remake its political system, despite the Kremlin’s rejection of democracy promotion in and around Russia as a threat to Russian domestic stability and. administrations have pursued the same unrealistic policies and contributed to the failure of the relationship. 
policy toward Russia has largely ignored such crucial factors as Russia’s history, culture, geography, and security requirements-as they are seen from Moscow. Russia, with its disruptive and often rogue actions, bears a major share of the responsibility for the deterioration in the relationship.
By the end of the administration, the relationship is at the lowest point since the end of the Cold War. A period of optimism follows, but obstacles to better relations emerge, and optimism gradually gives way to pessimism. It launches a policy review that generates a reset aimed at developing a partnership. Throughout this period, the U.S.-Russian relationship has experienced a familiar pattern of boom-bust cycles: a new administration comes in dissatisfied with the state of the relationship and promises to do better. administrations have struggled to come up with a sustainable policy toward Russia.
0 kommentar(er)
